Wrongful Death Laws

Wrongful Death Cases in the Athens-Clarke County Georgia Area
Mr. Simon and Mr. Ruppersburg have a great deal of experience handling wrongful death cases for families in Georgia. The firm has litigated 12 fatality cases in the last two years alone and boasts 22 years of combined experience overall.  If you are dealing with the loss of a loved one and are tirelessly searching through pages of legal websites for answers, there are some essential things that you need to know:


Although you are likely grieving, you need to hire an attorney promptly because evidence disappears and other claimants can come forward who may reduce the available insurance coverages.
Types of Evidence That Can Disappear:

    1) Skid and yaw marks
    2) 911 Witness phone calls
    3) Car and truck computer records
    4) eyewitnesses move and change phone numbers     

A wrongful death attorney in the Athens, Georgia area will review how the death occurred and deploy an expert collision reconstructionist to the scene and take pictures to confirm the evidence.  Typically, Georgia wrongful death attorneys will also send letters warning the at-fault driver and their insurance companies not to allow the evidence to “disappear,” and this practice protects the client in case the evidence later does disappear.

If Multiple People are Hurt of Killed in the Incident, Speed is Critical

If there are numerous people injured in the accident, you need to move with haste. In high velocity impacts, there are frequently multiple serious injuries. For example in a case involving a U.G.A. student who was killed in the end of 2010, there were four  serious fracture injuries, two wrongful death claims, and only three minor insurance policies available. 

Within three days of being hired, we sent demands for the limits of each of the insurance companies and beat many of the other claims to the punch.



Most of the lawyers you see on TV are ineffective and advertise because no one would go to them otherwise. I don't mean to be rude, but its generally true. Phone a friend who has been a customer and they will tell you about their chiropractic case.

Before you decide who to hire, you should interview at least two or three attorneys in person.   Also, inquire as to whether the lawyer has actually filed and litigated wrongful death cases before and what the results were.  Additionally, inquire about his current cases and what phase they are currently in.  Finally, ask the lawyer if you can speak with his clients. 
Learn the Basics of Wrongful Death Laws in Georgia Before Meeting with the Attorneys

Prior to meeting with the lawyer, you should have a general understanding of the fundamentals behind the law.  Please continue reading on our main firm page for details; just click on the Atlanta Georgia wrongful death page on the home office's site.

Recent Case Law Developments in Wrongful Death Law
The Georgia Court of Appeals recently addressed the propriety of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a decision involving the unfortunate death of a young student as he boarded a school bus. Long rural dirt roadThe case, Tift County School District v. Martinez, addresses possible negligence on the part of a school bus driver and the school district in the death of the minor.The record, viewed in a light favorable to the plaintiff, shows that on a morning in May 2010, the decedent was waiting for his school bus at the assigned location alongside a roadway. The school bus stopped at its typical location, but as the student crossed the street to meet the bus, he was struck by a vehicle that failed to yield to the school bus signals. The speed limit on the road was 55 miles per hour, and heavy fog made visibility difficult on that day.F

Following the accident, the mother of the decedent brought a wrongful death action against the bus driver and the school district, asserting various negligence claims against both. At the conclusion of discovery, the bus driver moved for summary judgment on official immunity grounds. Prior to the court’s resolution of the motion, the plaintiff and defendants entered into a stipulation acknowledging the driver was entitled to official immunity but waiving immunity to the extent recovery was possible through the school district’s insurance coverage. The stipulation made a similar acknowledgment with respect to the school district’s sovereign immunity with an analogous waiver pursuant to recovery from the insurer. The court accepted the stipulation and granted the motion for summary judgment. 

However, the defendants obtained leave of the trial court to file a second motion for summary judgment, arguing that the stipulation into which it had entered was ineffectual absent a statutory waiver of immunity. The trial court denied the second motion for summary judgment, and the defendants brought the current appeal.The defendants’ argument on appeal addressed two distinct issues: 1) whether statutory authority already waived sovereign immunity to the extent the School Board carried insurance coverage for the injury at issue; and 2) if statutory authority had not already waived immunity, did the stipulation effectuate waiver of immunity? The Court of Appeals decision focused only on the first issue. Indeed, O.C.G.A. § 33-24-51 allows “[a] municipal corporation, a county, or any other political subdivision . . . to secure and provide insurance to cover liability for damages on account of bodily injury or death resulting from bodily injury to any person . . . arising by reason of ownership, maintenance, operation, or use of any motor vehicle” and further that “governmental immunity shall be waived to the extent of the amount of insurance so purchased.” Although the defendants noted that a separate statutory provision, which is referenced in O.C.G.A. § 33-24-51, exempts local school boards from the definition of “local government entities,” the court found that this exemption did not apply to the waiver of immunity provided under O.C.G.A. § 33-24-51. Thus, the court held that there was statutory waiver of sovereign immunity. As a result, the defendant’s second issue need not be addressed.

The scope of immunity is always of fundamental importance when one sues a governmental actor. Indeed, arguments related to immunity, both in its scope and its applicability, are often as important as those directed toward the merits of the underlying tort claim. Even though most laypeople have a rudimentary understanding of negligence and other tort actions, the complexities of immunity doctrine can present problems that many would find difficult without the aid of competent counsel. Accordingly, if you’ve been harmed in a possible case of governmental negligence, you should deeply consider enlisting the assistance of counsel experienced in governmental liability claims. 

The Georgia wrongful death attorneys at Christopher Simon Attorney at Law have many years of experience litigating negligence claims against state and federal governmental entities and are ready to provide you with the guidance you may need. Feel free to contact us for a free case consultation if you are interested in hearing about the services we can provide.